why college athletes should not be paid statistics

: Save Paper - Premium Paper - Words: 573 - Pages: 3 Some experts believe this is because the organization wants to continue to control the exploitation of athletes for their own benefit. There is a good compromise with those who disagree with the idea of college athletes . Clemson Tigers head coach Dabo Swinney created quite the stir for his comments regarding coaches salaries in an interview with ESPN's Chris Low. They want them to be satisfied because winning teams bring in more revenue. College Athletes Are Now Closer To Getting Paid After NCAA Board OKs Plan. Everybody's getting paid anyway, you might as well make it legal. Many athletes want to be paid while they play their way through college (Hill, 2007; Nocera, 2011). Since 2003, the college sports industry's profits have skyrocketed, jumping from $4 billion in 2003 to over . . This type of a proposal could pay athletes anywhere from $300-$1000 per game based on time played per game. However, the National Collegiate Athletic Association refuses to allow student-athletes to be paid. Minor injuries like pulled muscles and sprains are easily handled by . The answers to these questions are part of a controversial debate about whether student athletes playing college-level sports should be paid. In many states, public universities' coaches are the highest-paid state employees. For underclassmen, this award can be valued up to $225, and for seniors, $425. The NCAA policy, which took effect in July 1, will allow college athletes and recruits to make money off of activities like autograph signings, endorsements and personal appearances as long as they. "That's just how it is. Check your local sports pages and ask yourself how many stories they publish on the economics of athletics or whether college athletes should be paid -- as well as about the clear link between lack of compensation and issues of race and inequality. 6 Reasons Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid They Already Get Full Scholarships One of the primary arguments against paying student-athletes rests on the assumption that they already receive full college scholarships. Everybody knows everybody's getting paid," Ball said. Yes, it seems backwards that the collegiate athletes bring in the money, and yet they do not get paid a single penny. The main reason why athletes don't deserve to be paid is because it's simply not the colleges' duty to do so. The average American full-time work contract usually stipulates that the employee will work between the hours of 8 AM and 5 PM five days per week. Gavin Newsom (D) recently signed the Fair Pay to Play Act, which starting in 2023 will let California's college athletes make money from their athletic efforts more . And in exchange for all that . Student athletes are stuck between two worlds, athletics and academics. Reduce corruption in college athletes This is perhaps the most important reason why institutions should pay college athletes. Academics should be the top priority. Calipari is also the top public earner in Kentucky: He is paid more than 60 times as much as the state's governor . Their families also often think that they should be paid, because they work very hard and they bring in a lot of revenue for the school. Athletes play at the college level and they further use that experience at the professional level where they will be paid. When college athletes get paid, they'll not need to look for employment . Student Athletes Should Not be Paid Essay. Argument 1: College Athletes Already Get Paid. 53 percent of the public and 62 percent of. It would attract better athletes who stay in programs longer. That's what the NCAA provides. Question Title. That's how I feel. Jun 16, 2011. University of Georgia football star A . That is not necessarily true, because illegal payments still could occur to ensure that an athlete will complete a task. College athletes should be paid because they're working a full-time job. while opponents argue that college football and basketball stars receive free college tuition, stipends and a platform to showcase their skills for professional teams, proponents of paying college. Currently, college athletes in the United States are not paid for their performance. Most of them are just as talented, if not more talented, than the vast majority of college athletes. Apr 8, 2022. They have so much more pressure on their shoulders than most students, they have practice, games, class, school work, and oftentimes a job to balance. But what people usually do not think about is all the work and effort that goes into the preparation for the limelight. How will college athletes get paid? A student who attempts to do this will end up leading a stressful life, which is not good for his or her health. This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. 5. No. They are students receiving access to a college education through their participation in sports . No, they are getting enough as it is. The school gets cash from ticket deals, TV contracts, and game related stock, alongside numerous different games related income . Colleges prepare athletes to go pro in . According to a PennLive article, Penn State student-athletes can receive "yearly awards" for participation. Everybody knows everybody's getting paid," Ball said. 7 Pages. Kentucky basketball's John Calipari is the highest-paid college coach in the United States at $9.2 million a year, according to USA Today. While Division 3 athletes do not get paid at all, only a portion of Division I and II athletes get paid, most not even on full scholarships which seems quite unfair given all the hard work that they dedicate to being both a student and an . Merit pay is defined as "an approach to compensation that rewards higher performing employees with additional pay, [which . Business Insider did an analysis calculating the value of each player by allocating 47% of annual football revenue over the 85 scholarship athletes. These differences in public response to payment of participants in college football highlight the innate hypocrisy of NCAA college athletic policies. the main research question, why don't all, but only some college athletes get paid to play their sport? Paying college athletes would create a whole new playing field, and the consequences would be costly (March Madness free, not pun-free.) Today, sports are not any more pointless fooling around, sports are a business, and school sports are the same. One reason college athletes should not be paid is because of the many benefits there already are to playing a collegiate sport. If student-athletes are good stewards of these funds, they could save thousands of dollars by the time they finish college. The only one's getting paid are the coaches. There is a split debate between whether college athletes should be paid or if they are getting paid through their scholarships, in David J. Berri's article "Paying NCAA Athletes" he says that " So it seems clear that college athletes are frequently exploited by the NCAA. Using statistics to find the number of injuries that occur in each year per sport can be a useful way to declare athletes as professionals or amateurs. * 2. The answer is simple: these athletes don't focus on the monetary aspect. Kevin Durant: $92.1 million. "I think there's no doubt that there is increasing public opinion support for allowing college athletes to be paid," he said. so far i said they recieve a free education, but im stuck with other . * 2. A more in-depth analysis, however, shows that paying college athletes would disrupt the nature of college athletics. No, the athlete does not get that money to spend on whatever they want, but the most important thing is paid for. Other students have different career goals, and manage their time accordingly. The NCAA's highest governing body supports allowing student-athletes to be . Even as the NCAA earned over $1 billion in . One being reduced or free admission also known as a scholarship. Doug Gottlieb. During a survey in the U.S. in 2021, 37 percent of respondents stated that they believed student . 2 reason: Student-athletes are provided with multiple types of resources to help them be successful. Coaches and athletic directors "earn" their exurbanite salaries each season, but players can only "earn" college tuition, and room and board. Take college archery teams for example. He also talks about why college athletes should be getting paid and how new legislation passed in California, Colorado and Florida is setting the stage for college athletes to finally be compensated while in school. And a 2017 Washington Post poll found that 2 in 3 respondents feel athletes should be paid when their name . Con 1: Paying Athletes Could Lead to Legal Issues. The National Collegiate Athletic Association raked in over $1 billion during the 2016-17 academic year. Another reason why college athletes should be paid is that a student can not manage to study, participate in sports activities, and also work part-time. This can also erase sports where athletes simply don't deserve to get paid. The fact that four out of 10 people are less likely to watch or attend college games is potentially "a huge loss of market share," Dennis testified. 2 reason: Student-athletes are provided with multiple types of resources to help them be successful. Jonathan also talks about an article he wrote in 2014, in regards to the NCAA exploiting college athletes, by benefiting from . In many states, public universities' coaches are the highest-paid state employees. The goal of attending a college program should be to earn a degree. "Importantly, this trend is occurring when the NCAA is under enormous pressure to allow for greater compensation for college athletes." 51% of Americans agree paying college athletes should be allowed Mainly due to the profit they generate, most people think that college athletes should get paid. Should only college athletes in the most popular and profitable sports (football and basketball) be paid? It is not illogical to suggest that inventors, who are college students, and athletes, who are college students, should be treated the same, i.e., each should share in the value they create for their institutions without being penalized. Matt Scharboneau Why College Athletes Should Be Paid. True: If paid, whether by salary or stipend, the athletes would become university employees. With more money comes more problems, and adding money to the life of a student athlete, is only going to exacerbate this fact. College athletes should not be paid because of the many benefits that come with being a student athlete and because it is not a realistic resolution. Division I school sports give an immense wellspring of colleges' pay. Why NCAA Athletes Should Get Paid Outline. However, there are two solid arguments as to why these athletes should not be paid for what they do. Athletics isn't the only path to college. All know why Kevin Durant ranked the sixth position of the top 10 highest paid athletes in 2022, according to the Forbes list. Not paying these athletes can heavily impact their lives and their future. They play college sports to experience the camaraderie of being part of a team. Why College Athletes Should be Paid. The logistics governing any sort of pay structure for college athletes is unavoidably complicated. With all this cash being brought in on the backs and through the labor of college athletes, the question "Why are college athletes not being paid . Although the law allows student athletes to profit from third-party deals, it does not require, or even allow, schools to pay student athletes for their work beyond the scholarships . Since most players do not play more than 30 minutes a game, a player could be paid on a per-minute of competition basis. A majority of Americans say college athletes should not be compensated beyond scholarships, according to results of a UMass Lowell-Washington Post poll. The average Division I player is worth $170,098 per year, with each of the 351 D1 basketball programs taking in more than $4.5 million in revenue on average each year, according to Business Insider. I'm not sure. According to its official website, the NCAA allocates around $216 million to Division I schools to help fund their sports and provide scholarships for college athletes. College Athletes Ready for a Career. College athletes should not be paid in order to keep a clear divide between amateur and professional sports. 10 College Athletes Spend an Average of 43.3 Hours Per Week Dedicated to Their Sport. The idea of paying college athletes is certainly not a new one though Yang does . Head football coaches at the 44 NCAA Bowl Championship Series schools received on average $2.1 million in salaries. Instead, they focus on more important things. The National Collegiate Athletic Association raked in over $1 billion during the 2016-17 academic year. That's just how the system works. No. Athletes should get paid especially because college is a tough time with money, so paying money to athletes will give college athletes more relief and will try to help them and aid them with whatever they need, like necessities they need to perform well.". 3 College Students are Financially Irresponsible. According to its official website, the NCAA allocates around $216 million to Division I schools to help fund their sports and provide scholarships for college athletes. The best way to stop this practice is to pay them. He notes the stark contrast between coach and player compensation: "If you look at the 2018 Ohio State versus Michigan football game, the coaching staffs were making over $30 million total. Editor's note: Earlier this month, Penn State assistant football coach Jay Paterno authored a thought-provoking essay on the topic of paying college athletes. His . Questions about the details are plentiful, and answers are scarce. If student-athletes are good stewards of these funds, they could save thousands of dollars by the time they finish college. Here are the top 10 reasons college athletes should not be paid: 10 College Athletic Programs Cannot Afford to Pay Athletes Colleges don't have the money to pay athletes. But when marketing, including video games, are involved, two-thirds of respondents said collegiate athletes should be compensated if their names or likenesses are used, according to the findings of the poll, which surveyed 1,000 American . A report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that between 2009-14 there were about 210,700 injuries on average per year among the roughly 478,900 college athletes participating in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) championship sports. Students are not professional athletes who are paid salaries and incentives for a career in sports. Knight Commission. A common analysis is to calculate the "fair market value" of college football players. Why Student Athletes Should Be Paid For quite some time now, there has been a big debate about whether or not college athletes should be paid. The reason why student athletes are not currently paid, according to the NCAA, is that it would eliminate the separation between amateurism and professionalism in sports. The Current System As it stands today, student-athletes have to balance schoolwork, a social life and 35 hours a week in-season without having time to make money Books, food and other expenses can be unattainable for some athletes without the ability to hold a job. In the meantime, if they cannot be paid outright, surely the scholarship athletes should be able to engage in entrepreneurial pursuits that currently leads to costly NCAA investigations that have . They learn valuable lessons about life, such as being humble in winning and being gracious in losing. The press conferences, the scholarships, the thousands of fans cheering their names all things that come to mind when talking about college athletes. Apr 8, 2022 Currently, college athletes in the United States are not paid for their performance. Stanford, for example, paid, not penalized, the founders of Google for their inventions while they were . 6. For the athletes that do have the ability to play professionally, going to college is a stop on the journey toward a good paycheck. Duh, I can't hold to my money better not give me any. California Gov. I'm not saying we should be paying athletes $5,000 or even $10,000 per semester. Con #2: Paying college athletes would be a logistical quagmire. However, the National Collegiate Athletic Association refuses to allow student-athletes to be paid. i am writing a documented essay as to why college athletes should NOT be paid. Most of them are paid roughly what a Starbucks barista is paid. Should College Athletes be Paid. Most of these athletes receive . Since 2003, the college sports industry's profits have skyrocketed, jumping from $4 billion in 2003 to over . This is why college athletes should be paid. The athletes on the field had zero salary.". Here are 21 of them: 1. But as we've discussed, this is seldom the case most athletes only receive partial scholarships. Everybody knows everybody's getting paid," Ball said. There has always been extensive debate over whether or not Division I . Another argument claims that without being an athlete, they'd never be able to be students. The stipend is intended to cover the cost of living, including rent and meals not provided by the university. Yes, college athletes deserve the right to negotiate a salary just like their coaches. Durant signed a four-year, $164 million contract with the Brooklyn Nets in 2019 after three years with the Golden State Warriors. We believe that extraordinary athletes deserve what businesses call merit pay. The biggest reason why college athletes should not be paid is that having a scholarship is technically a form of pay. It also seems clear that the obvious solution is for the NCAA to . The justification for not paying players is that they are student-athletes and the value of their scholarships - usually worth over $100,000 in the duration of four years - is payment enough. Colleges are primarily used to better your education, not kick start your athletic career. The typical Division I college football player devotes 43.3 hours per week to his . Some people say that paying college athletes will reduce the amount of illegal payments to the athletes. Student athletes say that sports are their only ticket to college. Given that most of the NCAA coaches and commentators who earn millions are white and most of the top athletes in revenue-generating sports are black, does racism play a role in the . Michigan's strength and conditioning coach makes $600,000 a year. Another reason why college athletes should be paid is that a student can not manage to study, participate in sports activities, and also work part-time. Besides, there are already some benefits to being a student athlete on campus. Some agents, coaches, and boosters conspire and pay recruits to join certain colleges. Paying college athletes would be unnecessary, unfair, and unfeasible. There are many reasons why NCAA athletes should be treated like traditional employees. For example, by getting college degrees, students can get . The average college student would kill to have their school already paid for. The stipend is intended to cover the cost of living, including rent and meals not provided by the university. It's trapped in their deep, deep pockets. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes around $100 million per year (Edelman, 2013, P.61). Los Angeles Lakers point guard Lonzo Ball recently said in an interview that college athletes should be paid. 3. This commission is a credible and influential voice on college athletics . The highest paid public employee in 40 of the 50 U.S. states is the state . During a survey in the U.S. in 2021, 37 percent of respondents stated that they believed student. California student athletes will be able to monetize their social media followings, provide paid coaching, enter endorsement and advertising deals, and hire agents. The University of Texas had the highest value $671,000, at OSU that value was $462,000 and the NCAA . Paying high school athlete students is an illegal act and it should stop. The main argument against paying college athletes is that this would lead to legal issues threatening collegiate sports' integrity. Last year, all the athletes in Division 1 schools generated 9.15 billion dollars in revenue. There has always been extensive debate over whether or not Division I . Austan Goolsbee, Chicago Booth. Even as the NCAA earned over $1 billion in . Some experts believe this is because the organization wants to continue to control the exploitation of athletes for their own benefit. If each athlete got $2,000 paid over the course of the semester, this would give them some spending cash and an opportunity to start managing their money. Even as the NCAA earned over $1 billion in . Many schools provide student-athletes with housing, a meal plan and tutoring. College students are too irresponsible to get paid. The Current System (cont.) The proposal was supported by several other coaches. On this side of the fence, the most common reason given for why college athletes should not be paid is that they already get paid: they receive free tuition and, in some cases, additional funding to cover their room, board, and miscellaneous educational expenses.